Notes

It’s like and, but we have developed a whole language around what these symbols mean, right? Over the course of decades. And so, if we don’t use them anymore, and everything is AI generated. If we AI generate emojis, you know, we’re not going to have a common language around them anymore. So, I wonder how many people just, kind of, default to the old emojis will just still just because they maybe understand what they mean.

Kimberly Adams isn’t wrong. People have taken emojis and integrated them into language. In some cases the emoji doesn’t equate to its actual meaning. It’s going to be interesting if that starts to fade with some of this or if it will stick around.

People create these sites simply so that they exist. They are not fed to an algorithm, or informed by any trends. It is quieter and slower, meant to tether us to a more mechanical framework of the web.

This is the analog web.

I’ve mentioned it many times, but the personal site renaissance is one of my favorite things. I know they’ve existed looooong before Twitter. I go through my RSS feeds and it just feels nicer, calmer. I hope I can help contribute to it.

Edit 6/9/2024: Fixed a typo. Thanks Andrew!

But now-a-days, any cross-disciplinary interest is easily interpreted as a lack of specialization and dedication to craft. If you’re doing design and code, how can you be really great at either? You’re not maximizing.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with specializing, I also don’t think there’s anything wrong with becoming a jack-of-all-trades.

Designers versus coders aside, I find it odd sometimes when people think that front end developers know no backend and vice versa. We all might be better in one area than another, but I feel like we can all contribute.

So here’s a small piece of advice, from one reformed overachiever to another (future) one: half-ass it. Pick a task, something small to start, and do it carelessly. Do half (or less) of what you would ordinarily do. Then see what happens. Consider it an experiment in which your intention is to learn, whatever the outcome. I’m betting your half-assed version is better than most people’s whole ass, but you can test that assertion yourself.

All too often people (including myself) say we’re going to do something, learn something, and then never actually do it. Doing something sloppy to learn something is often more than others do.

I’ve been asked when interviewing for a front end ecommerce position how the Javascript event loop works — in detail. I told the interviewer I didn’t know, had never needed to in previous positions but was confident I could figure it out. They hired me. I’ve taken a similar tack when discussing other roles with interviewers — I don’t know, but I like to learn and I’ll figure it out. Don’t know enough React? I’ll learn. Don’t know bespoke framework/internal tool X? I’ll learn.

This is the correct mindset. Don’t try to BS through answers, people will figure it out. Learn the fundamentals and picking up new frameworks and libraries will be doable.

You don’t need fancy software to write. You also don’t need a £1k+ camera to take photos, the latest console to play video games, or a certificate to learn something.

I’ve seen artists use Microsoft Paint to create amazing pictures. It goes to show you don’t need fancy tools to do great things. If you’re trying something new, start with the basics and go from there.

The question of whether CSS is a programming language serves only one purpose: to demote those who write it.

There is no confusion that needs to be clarified, and no other purpose in asking, beyond the most trivial kind of pedantry.

The debate itself is an act of gatekeeping, whether intentional or not. Its only significant effect is to elevate some work over other work, despite their essentially identical nature.

The only meaningful function of the question is segregation.

I really don’t get the whole “CSS isn’t a programming language” crowd. I see what other developers can do with CSS and am amazed. It’s something I’ve been consistently trying to improve on. The gatekeeping stuff is just BS.

It took no time at all to master Garfield, but when I started getting Calvin and Hobbes, I knew I was making progress; even when I didn’t understand the words, I could still marvel at the sheer exuberance and detail of the art.

I still read Calvin & Hobbes and I’m amazed at how much more I still get out of the strips. Bits and pieces of humor, insights into life, and more still permeate the strips.

There was always the running joke with how to center content. Then it became easier with CSS grid and flexbox. Now you don’t even need that.

With align-content available for block layout, you can achieve vertical alignment without needing to create a flex or grid layout for the property to work. No additional properties are needed as the item remains a block item, the only change is to the alignment.

Reporting on Trump has been giving the media fits since he first started his presidential run in 2015. The editor for The Cleveland Plain Dealer writes about what should be obvious.

The north star here is truth. We tell the truth, even when it offends some of the people who pay us for information.

This is what journalism is supposed to be. The truth regardless of what it is.

This is not subjective. We all saw it. Plenty of leaders today try to convince the masses we did not see what we saw, but our eyes don’t deceive. (If leaders began a yearslong campaign today to convince us that the Baltimore bridge did not collapse Tuesday morning, would you ever believe them?) Trust your eyes. Trump on Jan. 6 launched the most serious threat to our system of government since the Civil War. You know that. You saw it.

The facts involving Trump are crystal clear, and as news people, we cannot pretend otherwise, as unpopular as that might be with a segment of our readers. There aren’t two sides to facts. People who say the earth is flat don’t get space on our platforms. If that offends them, so be it.

I wish more of the news media was willing to ditch the false equivalency of Trump and the GOP and focus more on the truth regardless of who it might upset.

But despite all these claims, CSS is also somehow “not a real programming language.” Many people online will tell you so, often quite loudly, and sometimes even using memes. Same with HTML.

Sadly I understand where Josh is coming from.

Becoming better with CSS is something I really want to do. I want to improve my skills there and slowly I think I am.

Shame on anyone who thinks that creating amazing, beautiful, and accessible layouts with HTML & CSS is “easy” or should be devalued.

People keep saying “but they do the same to us.” That’s no excuse. We shouldn’t take a page from the Chinese censorship playbook and basically give them the moral high ground, combined with the ability to point to this move as justification for the shenanigans they’ve pulled in banning US companies from China.

If we’re doing what China is with regards to censorship, we’ve failed. This whole thing reeks of bad reasoning, and curtailing people’s speech.

Public sentiment in the US regarding China is reaching record lows, with the vast majority of Americans reasonably concerned about China’s role in the world. So if China is using TikTok to propagandize to Americans, it’s doing a shitty job of it.

Yup...